Historically, such cables were only evaluated for electrical continuity. But a fire alarm or emergency voice system cable can technically maintain acceptable continuity while the signal can have unacceptable degradation. Continuity alone may not demonstrate that a cable can support the communication performance expected in a fire and life safety signaling system.
That concern is consistent with research published by the NFPA Fire Protection Research Foundation in 2022, which examined whether elevated temperatures can affect the transmission and functional quality of alarm/data signals and voice messages in pathway-survivable cables used for life safety systems, including emergency voice/alarm communication systems (EVACS) and emergency responder communications enhancement systems (ERCES). The report found that fire-related signal impacts are possible, though researchers did not find documented evidence of those impacts in EVACS or ERCES installations. The issue is not that every survivable pathway is known to lose signal quality during a fire — it is that continuity alone may not provide enough information about how voice, data or radio frequency (RF) signals perform as heat, water exposure and mechanical stress affect the installed pathway.
The report also found no scientific studies showing that fire-rated enclosures or sprinkler systems specifically mitigate thermally induced data or voice signal degradation in cables, although those protections can reduce the temperatures to which cables are exposed. Knowing whether the circuit remains intact is not the same as knowing what communication performance the cable system was tested to support under defined fire conditions.
The third edition of UL 2196 requires data and communication cables to maintain acceptable signal integrity in accordance with the manufacturer's performance specifications while also maintaining circuit integrity throughout both the fire endurance test and the hose stream test.
Two details are particularly important when interpreting a manufacturer's performance specifications. First, UL 2196 permits manufacturers to define performance specifications for both normal operating conditions and conditions following exposure to the fire endurance and hose stream tests. These specifications are to be based on recognized industry standards, such as those published by the Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) or the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), applicable military specification sheets or other accepted standards.
Second, compliance with the manufacturer's performance specifications is evaluated through testing. Data acquisition is performed every five minutes throughout the entire fire endurance test. Following the hose stream test, measurements are taken within five minutes of test completion and then recorded at five-minute intervals for a minimum of 30 minutes. This approach allows signal performance to be monitored throughout the testing process rather than being evaluated only at the conclusion of testing.